“讨论:2016年跨学科系统集成设计挑战-组间互评表”版本间的差异

来自iCenter Wiki
跳转至: 导航搜索
组间互评
计分组: 宋颖的组间互评表意见
第4行: 第4行:
 
#兰岚:
 
#兰岚:
 
#郎加兴:
 
#郎加兴:
#宋颖:
+
#宋颖:1.预算是否合理;2.衣着是否得体;3.故事是否具有现实意义;4.故事的趣味性评分;5.时间把控是否合理;6.PPT和视频美感评分。
 
#王东:
 
#王东:
 
#王伟真:
 
#王伟真:
 
#王小珊:
 
#王小珊:
 +
 
===其他参与者===
 
===其他参与者===
 
===组间互评===
 
===组间互评===

2016年1月17日 (日) 12:16的版本

组间互评维度征集

  • 每位参与者3-5个,截止时间中午2016年1月17日12:00,格式:过程汇报组间互评维度+带时间戳语法签名

计分组

  1. 兰岚:
  2. 郎加兴:
  3. 宋颖:1.预算是否合理;2.衣着是否得体;3.故事是否具有现实意义;4.故事的趣味性评分;5.时间把控是否合理;6.PPT和视频美感评分。
  4. 王东:
  5. 王伟真:
  6. 王小珊:

其他参与者

组间互评

  1. 口齿清晰 郎加兴 (talk) 11:52, 17 January 2016 (CST)
  2. 思路清晰 郎加兴 (talk) 18:02, 17 January 2016 (CST)
  3. 方案规划完整 郎加兴 (talk) 11:52, 17 January 2016 (CST)
  4. 方案规划有条理 郎加兴 (talk) 11:52, 17 January 2016 (CST)
  5. 个人学习报告是否完成 郎加兴 (talk) 11:52, 17 January 2016 (CST)
  6. WIKI问题库是否有贡献问题 郎加兴 (talk) 11:52, 17 January 2016 (CST)
  7. 产品展示 郎加兴 (talk) 17:20, 17 January 2016 (CST)
  8. 采购方案 郎加兴 (talk) 18:01, 17 January 2016 (CST)
  9. 产品总结及反思 郎加兴 (talk) 18:01, 17 January 2016 (CST)