“讨论:2016年跨学科系统集成设计挑战-组间互评表”版本间的差异

• 每位参与者3-5个,截止时间中午2016年1月17日12：00，格式：过程汇报组间互评维度+带时间戳语法签名

1. 语言表达；
2. 故事内容；
3. 预算方案；
4. 团队主页；
5. 逻辑模型；

计分组

1. 兰岚：1.衣着得体；2.表达流畅；3.展示效果；4.预算合理；5.故事精彩--兰岚_April (talk) 20:10, 17 January 2016 (CST)
2. 郎加兴：
3. 宋颖：1.预算是否合理；2.衣着是否得体；3.故事是否具有现实意义；4.故事的趣味性评分；5.时间把控是否合理；6.PPT和视频美感评分。
4. 王东：
5. 王伟真：1.（态度分）精神面貌、版面设计2.（规范性分）内容摘要和关键词3.（现场表现分）结构严谨，层次分明，论述清晰，语言流畅，表达准确4.（提高分即拉分点）逻辑性强，对问题有较深入的分析。
6. 王小珊：

其他参与者

自主评分规则：语言表达；内容；链接；格式

组间互评

1. 口齿清晰 郎加兴 (talk) 11:52, 17 January 2016 (CST)
2. 思路清晰 郎加兴 (talk) 18:02, 17 January 2016 (CST)
3. 方案规划完整 郎加兴 (talk) 11:52, 17 January 2016 (CST)
4. 方案规划有条理 郎加兴 (talk) 11:52, 17 January 2016 (CST)
5. 个人学习报告是否完成 郎加兴 (talk) 11:52, 17 January 2016 (CST)
6. WIKI问题库是否有贡献问题 郎加兴 (talk) 11:52, 17 January 2016 (CST)
7. 产品展示 郎加兴 (talk) 17:20, 17 January 2016 (CST)
8. 采购方案 郎加兴 (talk) 18:01, 17 January 2016 (CST)
9. 产品总结及反思 郎加兴 (talk) 18:01, 17 January 2016 (CST)